![]() ![]() ![]() When presented with a list of options, for example, you have to scroll through them in order to find the one you’re after. Although it looks interesting, it does absolutely nothing for usability and makes things feel unnecessarily cramped. Navman sensibly includes a mains feed as standard.Ĭlearly inspired by the iPhone’s success, Navman’s new Glide Touch interface consists of various menus that you scroll through by dragging your finger up and down the screen. Naturally, they also come with in-car power adaptors, but while TomTom supplies a USB docking cradle, its mains adaptor is an optional extra. As a result, the S100 fared worse in sunny conditions since it’s far more susceptible to reflections.īoth satnavs have 1GB of storage, and both let you increase this with Micro SD cards. Each has a 4.3in screen with a resolution of 480 x 272, but while the TomTom sticks with a traditional matte finish, Navman has opted for a glossy look. Navman’s desire to create a thin device also has an adverse effect on battery life, which we’ll come to later.īoth cast physical buttons aside, leaving you at the mercy of their touchscreens. The Navman is a lot thinner - 13.5mm to the TomTom’s 23mm - and lighter - 150g instead of 224g - but if you’re happy leaving your satnav in the glove box, size and weight aren’t really an issue. With smooth, curved edges and a solid feel, it definitely has the appearance of being the more expensive of the two. Going by looks alone, the TomTom wins hands-down. Line them up: Navman S100 and TomTom Go 540 Live ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |